![]() |
| Ideas, thoughts, and resources from the permanently curious. |
| Living | World | Politics | Business | SciTech | Health | Entertainment | Opinion | Sports | About | Contact |
| |||||||||
|
Understanding the medical establishment, with suggestions for improvement (12/28/05) Throughout my life I have contended with a bevy of problems which I now know to be abnormal. In childhood it was just grouchiness, the occasional headache, and some oddball problems like insomnia and a lightheadedness when standing abruptly. The thing is, these things were such a part of my life I couldn't expect them to be abnormal. They were happening everyday, as a normal part of my day. By college the situation had grown worse, ever so slowly, to horrible migraines and sensory sensitivity such that a bright light, loud noise, or old TV could trigger a migraine and send me to bed. At the time I figured it was because of the food, alcohol, allergies, or even my long delayed wisdom tooth removal. It wasn't till after college that I had the time to actually improve these things and see that nothing changed. I was terrified. I figured I had a brain tumor or something worse. In a way, I was far worse. For three years all the scans and tests the doctors ran showed absolutely nothing wrong. Before a person turns to doctors for serious help I think we all have this assumption that they can fix anything - that they are more than human. The sad news is they aren't. They are people doing their jobs, just like us, subject to the same problems we have such as a lack of information or lapses in judgment and attention. So I did what I always do when I'm in a hard place. I dug in and prepared to fight. I read a lot of books and other materials. I learnt to question the doctors on what was happening with my body, and to learn more about those things they even they knew. I wrote to every doctor I'd ever seen to have my records sent to me so I could establish a reference center for myself. I also learnt how the "system" works: about references, co-pays and what health insurance does and doesn't pay for. The importance of having a really good PCP can't be understated. So many aren't. I got organized. After a while so much has been tried it is important not to repeat steps, which sounds shallow but really matters when it is getting up at 2am to lay around in a claustrophobic MRI chamber or have 80 needles stuck in me at once (that wasn't a good day at all). I made up an excel chart to keep track of it all, organized broadly into phases of my treatment vs. my symptoms. Here's an example one, and a blank one for you all. Mine had 12 symptoms and 14 tests, and is still a work in progress, unfortunately. I even went so far as to comb my little personal reference center for all of my BP readings and chart them, along with listing the event if it was something other than a regular doctors visit. The funny thing was watching the progression of conditions. When we're dealing with syndromes the causality isn't known and so many could be linked even if they don't appear to be from the symptoms. Migraines, cluster headaches, tension headaches, and the like all have different names and some group of doctors likes to set down what the specifics of them are but without knowing what is causing them it is very hard to nail down one from the other. Different people will exhibit symptoms in different ways. That's just the way we are. Neurology, in particular, faces this because it isn't a very developed science at the moment. How so? We've been doing medicine for thousands of years but most of that has been focused on communicable diseases and the like. It has only been in the last 150 to 50 years that we haven't needed to worry about those so much, due in large part to the advances in public health projects, so we could devote a larger proportion of our resources to topics like neurology. As a consequence one theory, still in it's begining stages, takes a broad swipe out of these. Post Concussive Syndome, IBS, Fibromyalgia, CFS, migraines, etc., are all probably descended from Central Sensitization (CS), a problem that can be triggered by traumatic head injuries like the ones I received a couple of times. But it has only been recently that the evidence for this has come together, so instead everyone with those problems has had to sit and wonder what was going on. The downside? It's just a theory at the moment. A lot of docs don't even know about it and the few who do don't know how to treat it. This is strange because the theory states very plainly how it works. Amitriptyline works because it is an NMDA receptor antagonist, reducing the "throughput" of the glutamergic system on which CS depends on. Namenda, a new Alzheimer's drug, was specifically developed to be a NMDA receptor antagonist. For Alzheimer's. What's the link? People who've had a traumatic brain injury have a 37% higher risk of developing Alzheimer's than folks who haven't. Reduce the glutamate and the condition gets better. But the average doc on the ground doesn't even know Alzheimer's is linked to CS, nor do they know about CS, so their not going to think a drug like Namenda could help people with IBS, migraines, or the other things I mentioned. The research Docs can't possibly explore CS as fast as we need them to. It is going to explain a lot, for a lot of people. Personally I think depression is linked to it as well. CS is maintained via dynorphin, which blocks dopamine, meaning sporadically low dopamine levels for the unfortunate recipient. That can cause depression. Believe me, I know. Better yet is something like hypoglycemia. The condition is so vilified that doctors reserve it for all but the worst cases even though a lot of people, myself included, are clearly sensitive to drops in blood sugar. Turns out I'm not a grumpy person unless I've botched my blood sugar management. I wish I'd known that awhile ago. A poor understanding of food can only compound the problem. I reasoned that since veggies set off the problem then it couldn't have been sugar that was giving my problems. Turns out potatoes and corn are almost all simple sugars, as are most fruit juices. There's a reason diabetics are told to drink orange juice if their blood sugar crashes. It has enough sugar to completely reverse the effect and save them, assuming they get a longer acting food such as a protein into them before it crashes again (think minutes, not hours). It's problems like these that have led me to believe our healthcare system definitely isn't helping as many people out as it could be. Partially that is because everything is still murky. Our DNA work should help reduce some of that, as will insights such as CS. It would also help if PCPs stopped being "gateways to the specialists" and instead acted as project managers, strategically deciding on which direction to investigate next with a patient. At some point, with cases like mine, the patient just turns into a cash cow, going back to the same specialist month after month to discuss the minutia of the latest drug treatment with no real understanding of the underlying problem and little positive effect for the patient. I don't think Docs would do that nearly as much if they saw a disease within a patient as a project that needed to be completed. I found out I've been dealing with these things for most of my childhood and young adult years. They are getting better, and with everything I know now I'll probably try to apply it all to my job. But for those of you out there reading this, just stick it out. Don't give up, don't depend on your doctors to know what is best for you. That is up to you. Find one you can work with. Not one with a nice smile or the one that reassures you, one you can work with. If they won't manage your case you'll need to. That is up to you too. Good luck. Some thoughts for the policy makers:
I understand a lot of these things are being held up because folks are afraid of law suits. Ok, so lets say that and tackle that problem then. A lot of folks have ideas on tort reform and some are quite good, but they are not going to happen until someone makes it happen. As a consequence we're going to continue having problems until someone identifies the root problems and fixes them. So speak up, please! Update (11/26/2006): Michael Gurven and colleagues of UC Santa Barbara have been studying the life expectancy of modern day hunter gathers and found something interesting. While 40 to 50% of the children born die before the age of 15, once a person hits 15 they have a 40% change of making 65, and by the time folks are 70 and higher the mortality rate is no higher than it is in the US. I talked above about the changes in medicine over the last 150 years in diminishing the effect of communicable diseases and poor sanitary conditions. That would have taken care of the 40-50% deaths rate for children under 15. So what advances have we made after that? It sounds like none. Think about that. Someone needs to start applying the lessons of Systems Safety to our food supply. Real Food by Nina Planck made me realize that. Omega 6 to 9 ratios, powdered milk, corn based diets, homogenization, pasteurization, etc. We've made a mistep someplace and the trick now is to find it. Living a simplier diet isn't a bad thing anyway. Thanks Nina!
Opinion Most popular topics |
| Living | World | Politics | Business | SciTech | Health | Entertainment | Opinion | Sports | About | Contact |